Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolStanford OVAL Lab/10 trustVerified
STORM logo

STORM

LLM system that researches a topic and writes Wikipedia-like articles with citations.

Visit official site →

About

STORM (Synthesis of Topic Outlines through Retrieval and Multi-perspective Question Asking) is a Stanford OVAL Lab system that writes Wikipedia-like articles from scratch based on internet search. It simulates a multi-perspective research process: the system asks questions from different angles, retrieves sources, and synthesizes an outlined, cited article. Co-STORM extends it with human-AI collaborative knowledge curation, letting people steer the information-seeking process.

The codebase ships as the knowledge-storm Python package with litellm integration so different components can use different models to balance cost and quality. The research preview at storm.genie.stanford.edu has been tried by more than 70,000 people; experienced Wikipedia editors have found it useful in the pre-writing stage, though the authors note it does not produce publication-ready articles without editing. The work is published as arXiv papers 2402.14207 and 2408.15232, MIT licensed, with over 31k GitHub stars.

What it can do

  • Multi-perspective question-driven research
  • Wikipedia-style article synthesis with citations
  • Co-STORM human-AI collaborative curation
  • Per-component model selection via litellm
  • Live research preview web demo

Setup

  1. pip install knowledge-storm
  2. Configure LLM and retrieval models via litellm
  3. Run the pipeline on a topic, or try the live research preview

Prerequisites

Python; LLM API keys (via litellm) and search/retrieval access.

Use cases

knowledge-curationarticle-generationresearchwikipedia-drafting

Works with

Trust score — 9/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 9/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Verified via official GitHub repo + stanford-oval research preview + arXiv papers 2402.14207/2408.15232, batch277; GitHub 31,644 stars; authors note output is not publication-ready without editing; Trending score 88/100 from researcher assessment. License: MIT.

★ 31,644 GitHub stars

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.