
Qodo
AI code-quality platform — PR review plus test generation (ex-CodiumAI).
About
Qodo (qodo.ai, formerly CodiumAI) is an AI code-quality platform combining automated PR review with test generation: Qodo Merge (AI PR reviewer, built on the Apache-2.0 open-source PR-Agent), Qodo Cover (automated unit tests), and Qodo Gen (IDE + CLI).
$70M Series B in March 2026 ($120M total), Gartner Visionary 2025, 1M+ developers claimed (provider figure). Qodo 2.0 (Feb 2026) uses a multi-agent review architecture. Free Developer plan; Teams $30/user/mo; Enterprise custom. The pick when review + coverage matter more than raw codegen.
What it can do
- AI PR review (multi-agent)
- Automated test generation
- Open-source PR-Agent core
- IDE + CLI + Git app
- Enterprise context engine
Setup
- Install the Qodo Merge GitHub/GitLab app on your repos.
- Add the Qodo Gen IDE extension for test generation.
- Configure review instructions and the enterprise context engine as needed.
Prerequisites
GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket/Azure DevOps; Teams plan for org features.
Use cases
Works with
Trust score — 7/10
Scored 7/10 (metrics tier). Well-funded ($70M Series B), Gartner-recognized, with an open-source core — but the platform itself is proprietary and adoption figures are provider-claimed. Metrics tier.
How the trust score is built
Full methodology →- Adoption · stars/downloads, log-scaled vs peers
- 7.0/10
- Maintenance · recency, releases, issue load
- 7.0/10
- Openness · license + docs
- 6.6/10
- Manual review · sanity read + red-flag check
- 8.0/10
- · provider-tier estimate — thinner evidence (no public adoption metric)
- · 1M+ developers claimed by provider; no public repo for the platform itself
- · released 254 days ago
- · manual review: AI code-quality platform (ex-CodiumAI); $70M Series B Mar 2026; Gartner Visionary; Qodo 2.0 multi-agent review; 1M+ developers claimed; license: proprietary platform; open-source PR-Agent (Apache-2.0) at its core
Sources
Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.