Skip to content
← Tools / Skills
ToolCoqui AI (community-maintained)/10 trustVerified

Coqui TTS

Open-source deep learning TTS toolkit — VITS, XTTS voice cloning, multilingual, 44k+ GitHub stars.

Retired

Coqui TTS appears to be discontinued or shut down — company shut down 2024; community-maintained This page is kept as an archive record and is excluded from search engines.

Visit official site →

About

Coqui TTS is an open-source deep learning toolkit for text-to-speech synthesis, originally developed by Coqui AI and now maintained by the community. It provides a unified interface to multiple neural TTS architectures including VITS, Tacotron2, GlowTTS, FastSpeech2, and Bark, with a built-in training pipeline for fine-tuning on custom datasets. The XTTS v2 model enables zero-shot voice cloning from a short reference clip and cross-lingual synthesis across 17+ languages.

The honest picture: Coqui AI the company shut down in 2024, so the project survives purely on community maintenance — updates are slower than commercial alternatives. Voice quality varies significantly by model, and running the larger models needs a decent GPU. But for teams that need full control, offline inference, or zero vendor lock-in, it remains the most battle-tested open TTS framework available.

What it can do

  • VITS, Tacotron2, GlowTTS, FastSpeech2, Bark model architectures
  • Zero-shot voice cloning via XTTS v2
  • Multilingual synthesis (17+ languages)
  • Built-in training pipeline for custom voices
  • CLI, Python API, and HTTP server modes

Setup

pip install TTS, then run tts --text "Hello" --model_name tts_models/en/ljspeech/vits or use the Python API. Models download automatically on first use.

Prerequisites

Python 3.9+, PyTorch; a GPU is recommended for the larger XTTS models.

Use cases

text-to-speechvoice-cloningopen-source-audio

Works with

Trust score — 8/10

/10 trustVerified

Scored 8/10 (verified tier, metrics-v1). Evidence: Verified via vendor site/docs/GitHub and reputable coverage, wave 53; Trending score 78/100 from researcher assessment.

★ 44,959 GitHub stars

Sources

Every fact above was checked against these sources. Where a claim comes from the provider and couldn't be independently verified, the text says so.